English version not available. Please check the Spanish version.
Ledmar J. Vargas-Rodríguez 1
, Juana M. González-Sierra 2
, Jessica P. Rodríguez-Barón 2
, María P. Pineda-Díaz 2
, Jennifer J. Rodríguez-Niño 2
, Gustavo Ramos-Sepúlveda 3 
1 Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Metropolitano Santiago de Tunja, Tunja, Colombia; 2 Programa de Medicina, Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia; 3 Programa de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de las Américas, Pereira, Colombia
*Correspondence: Ledmar J. Vargas-Rodríguez. Email: lejovaro@gmail.com
Objective: Analyze and describe knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding performing a vasectomy in university students.
Method: Descriptive study based on surveys conducted among university students in Boyacá, aged between 16 and 27, during the period from April 18, 2022, to May 7, 2022. The variables included in this study were level of knowledge, beliefs, and attitudes towards vasectomy.
Results: For a man, the choice of a contraceptive method depends on his marital status, as well as the desire to have children or, on the contrary, not to have them. On the other hand, knowledge of the procedure is low, and they believe that good information given by a professional is very important, as well as consultation with their partner, to define vasectomy as a contraceptive method.
Conclusions: Beliefs, knowledge, and attitudes towards vasectomy in a man have a great impact when choosing it as a contraceptive method. It has also been seen that when advised by doctors or family planning personnel, the probability that the individual will choose this method increases. It is therefore of vital importance to reinforce planning and contraception programs in both men and women, to increase knowledge and thus awareness regarding performing vasectomy as a responsible and safe method.
English version not available. Please check the Spanish version.
Text only available in Spanish.
Mallorca, 310
08037 Barcelona (España)
Arquímedes, 190 – Colonia Polanco
Delegación Miguel Hidalgo
11560 Ciudad de México (México)
This journal adheres to the principles established by the Committee on Publication Ethics
The editorial process consists of 6 stages:
1. Reception of the manuscript (indeterminate, depending on whether the author meets the requirements): its objective is to verify that the manuscript complies with the specifications of these instructions for authors and that the submitted documentation is complete.
2. Initial editorial review (maximum 5 business days): its objective is to corroborate the relevance, timeliness, originality, and scientific contribution of the manuscript, as well as the methodological and statistical soundness of the study. At this time, it will be submitted to an electronic plagiarism detection system. Derived from this, a rejected opinion may be obtained, or it will be sent for review by peer researchers.
3. Review by peer researchers (maximum 30 business days): the opinion of at least two experts in the area in question will be obtained, who will evaluate the technical and methodological aspects of the investigation.
4. Editorial review (maximum 7 business days): its objective is to make a decision based on the opinion of peer reviewers. The opinion can be rejected, major changes, minor changes or accepted. In the case of major or minor changes, it will be submitted again for evaluation by the initial peer reviewers.
5. Final edition (6 weeks): its objective is the technical and linguistic edition (and translation), layout of galleys, DOI assignment, and correction by the author.
6. Advanced publication: All manuscripts will be published ahead of print on the journal’s website as soon as they complete the editing process, until they are incorporated into a final issue of the journal.