COVID-19 impact on bladder cancer treatment

COVID-19 impact on bladder cancer treatment

Fabrício Kaminagakura 1, Marcos F. Dall'Oglio 1, José A. da Silva Jr. 1, Klebson Rodrigues-Barbosa 1, Jorge Ocké 1, Luiz J. Budib 1

1 Department of Urology, Santa Marcelina Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil

*Correspondence: Fabrício Kaminagakura, Email not available

Abstract

Objective: The proposed study aims to present the experience with radical cystectomy from a urology service in a public teaching, non-profit hospital with a medical residency service, during the COVID-19 pandemic period in 2020. Materials and methods: We led a prospective study from February 2020 to October 2020, in which three 2nd-year urology residents, guided by one particular attending physician, performed 20 radical cystectomies in an acute public hospital. Results: Most patients were male, with Muscle-invasive bladder cancer being the major indication in our sample. There was a meaningful and direct correlation between surgical time and length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit. Conclusion: Despite the complexity of the surgery, the execution of radical cystectomies during a pandemic period is feasible, with positive surgical results and complication rates compatible with the current literature.

Keywords: COVID-19. Bladder cancer. Cystectomy. Prognosis.

Contents

DOI: 10.24875/RUC.23000044
Add to Mendeley

    PERMANYER

    Mallorca, 310
    08037 Barcelona (España)

    Arquímedes, 190 – Colonia Polanco
    Delegación Miguel Hidalgo
    11560 Ciudad de México (México)

    RECURRING LINKS
    CLOCKSS is a dak archive that ensures the long-term survival of web-based scholary publications, governed by and for its stakeholders.

    This journal adheres to the principles established by the Committee on Publication Ethics

    Descargar PDF
    English versión
    DOI: 10.24875/RUC.23000044

    Editorial times

    The editorial process consists of 6 stages:

    1. Reception of the manuscript (indeterminate, depending on whether the author meets the requirements): its objective is to verify that the manuscript complies with the specifications of these instructions for authors and that the submitted documentation is complete.

    2. Initial editorial review (maximum 5 business days): its objective is to corroborate the relevance, timeliness, originality, and scientific contribution of the manuscript, as well as the methodological and statistical soundness of the study. At this time, it will be submitted to an electronic plagiarism detection system. Derived from this, a rejected opinion may be obtained, or it will be sent for review by peer researchers.

    3. Review by peer researchers (maximum 30 business days): the opinion of at least two experts in the area in question will be obtained, who will evaluate the technical and methodological aspects of the investigation.

    4. Editorial review (maximum 7 business days): its objective is to make a decision based on the opinion of peer reviewers. The opinion can be rejected, major changes, minor changes or accepted. In the case of major or minor changes, it will be submitted again for evaluation by the initial peer reviewers.

    5. Final edition (6 weeks): its objective is the technical and linguistic edition (and translation), layout of galleys, DOI assignment, and correction by the author.

    6. Advanced publication: All manuscripts will be published ahead of print on the journal’s website as soon as they complete the editing process, until they are incorporated into a final issue of the journal.