Inicio » 2023 » Volume 32 - Number 4 » Systematic review: interventions in sickle cell disease-related priapism in reducing overall morbidity, recurrence, and side effects
*Correspondence: Hugo E. López-Ramos, Email not available
Pediatric priapism is a rare, underreported urological emergency. Sickle cell disease (SCD)-related priapism cases should be assessed considering specific pathophysiologic characteristics. Chronic control of the disease has an impact on a patient’s quality of life. A systematic review in different databases was done, for defining if management in All-type priapism in SCD patients was equally effective in reducing overall morbidity, disability and comorbidities, recurrence, and therapy-related side effects. Qualitative analysis was performed. Nine studies were included in the study; the majority were case series, and 300 patients were included in the analysis. The interventions and outcomes were clinically heterogeneous but displayed perspectives for further studies. This is the first analysis approach for a consensus for SCD-related priapism treatment. Studies with internal validity and causality designs are needed, to evaluate further causality relationships and establish evidence- based approaches. Etilefrine, Pseudoephedrine/etilefrine-5 inhibitors, and finasteride are promising strategies. Quality of life scores should be applied to these patients, and molecular studies should be developed for pharmacological designs.
Mallorca, 310
08037 Barcelona (España)
Arquímedes, 190 – Colonia Polanco
Delegación Miguel Hidalgo
11560 Ciudad de México (México)
This journal adheres to the principles established by the Committee on Publication Ethics
The editorial process consists of 6 stages:
1. Reception of the manuscript (indeterminate, depending on whether the author meets the requirements): its objective is to verify that the manuscript complies with the specifications of these instructions for authors and that the submitted documentation is complete.
2. Initial editorial review (maximum 5 business days): its objective is to corroborate the relevance, timeliness, originality, and scientific contribution of the manuscript, as well as the methodological and statistical soundness of the study. At this time, it will be submitted to an electronic plagiarism detection system. Derived from this, a rejected opinion may be obtained, or it will be sent for review by peer researchers.
3. Review by peer researchers (maximum 30 business days): the opinion of at least two experts in the area in question will be obtained, who will evaluate the technical and methodological aspects of the investigation.
4. Editorial review (maximum 7 business days): its objective is to make a decision based on the opinion of peer reviewers. The opinion can be rejected, major changes, minor changes or accepted. In the case of major or minor changes, it will be submitted again for evaluation by the initial peer reviewers.
5. Final edition (6 weeks): its objective is the technical and linguistic edition (and translation), layout of galleys, DOI assignment, and correction by the author.
6. Advanced publication: All manuscripts will be published ahead of print on the journal’s website as soon as they complete the editing process, until they are incorporated into a final issue of the journal.