Day: 3 September 2025

The impact of mucosal cuff length on premature ejaculation in circumcised men: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction Premature ejaculation (PE) is one of the most common male sexual dysfunctions, affecting approximately one-third of men worldwide1,2. It leads to distress in both the man and his sexual partner and has negative effects on quality of life3. According to the International Society of Sexual Medicine (ISSM), PE is characterized by ejaculation that occurs […]

Periodontal disease and prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction Periodontal disease (PD) is a chronic disease caused by inflammation related to infection, which has a negative impact on the tooth’s supporting structures1. The main etiology of PD is aggressive disorganized biofilm and periodontal microorganisms2. At present, PD remains a global public health issue, as evidenced by 1.09 billion cases and 91.5 million new […]

Cadaveric fascia lata allograft in treating stress urinary incontinence. Systematic review

Introduction Urinary incontinence (UI) is defined as any involuntary loss of urine. It can be classified into three main types: (1) Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), which, according to the International Urogynecological Association and the International Continence Society, is defined as “the observation of involuntary leakage from the urethra synchronous with physical effort or sneezing or […]

PERMANYER

Mallorca, 310
08037 Barcelona (España)

Arquímedes, 190 – Colonia Polanco
Delegación Miguel Hidalgo
11560 Ciudad de México (México)

RECURRING LINKS
CLOCKSS is a dak archive that ensures the long-term survival of web-based scholary publications, governed by and for its stakeholders.

This journal adheres to the principles established by the Committee on Publication Ethics

Editorial times

The editorial process consists of 6 stages:

1. Reception of the manuscript (indeterminate, depending on whether the author meets the requirements): its objective is to verify that the manuscript complies with the specifications of these instructions for authors and that the submitted documentation is complete.

2. Initial editorial review (maximum 5 business days): its objective is to corroborate the relevance, timeliness, originality, and scientific contribution of the manuscript, as well as the methodological and statistical soundness of the study. At this time, it will be submitted to an electronic plagiarism detection system. Derived from this, a rejected opinion may be obtained, or it will be sent for review by peer researchers.

3. Review by peer researchers (maximum 30 business days): the opinion of at least two experts in the area in question will be obtained, who will evaluate the technical and methodological aspects of the investigation.

4. Editorial review (maximum 7 business days): its objective is to make a decision based on the opinion of peer reviewers. The opinion can be rejected, major changes, minor changes or accepted. In the case of major or minor changes, it will be submitted again for evaluation by the initial peer reviewers.

5. Final edition (6 weeks): its objective is the technical and linguistic edition (and translation), layout of galleys, DOI assignment, and correction by the author.

6. Advanced publication: All manuscripts will be published ahead of print on the journal’s website as soon as they complete the editing process, until they are incorporated into a final issue of the journal.