English version not available. Please check the Spanish version.
Ismael Cardozo-Rivera 1 , Herney A. García-Perdomo 2
1 Área Audiovisual y Narrativas Digitales, Facultad de Comunicación, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Cali, Colombia; 2 UROGIV Research Group, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology/Urooncology, School of Medicine, Universidad de Valle, Cali; Colombia
*Correspondence: Ismael Cardozo-Rivera. Email: icardozo@uao.edu.co
Objective: UOR is a transmedia project carried out between the Narratives and Digital Journalism hotbed of the Universidad Autónoma de Occidente and the UROGIV research group of the Universidad del Valle, which was born from the research-creation objective of developing a transmedia narrative. This project would make it possible to contribute to the prevention of urological cancer, using the knowledge and the different investigations of the urology research group at the service of the community.
Method: For this, a methodology was carried out that included a search, classification and selection of the papers advanced by UROGIV, the formulation of a model for the URO transmedia narrative and finally its evaluation based on the scope of the proposal in digital media and the analysis in its realization process.
Results: A series of contents such as podcasts, video-documentaries and infographics were generated, socialized through the Spotify, Instagram, Facebook and YouTube platforms. In addition, a web repository that would allow uniting all the proposals of the project. Fifty-one communicative products were made. Instagram had follower accounts and interactions that allowed the platform to be evaluated positively.
Conclusion: The development of this transmedia narrative showed as conclusions the importance of carrying out initiatives of this nature, and of adapting publications in urology to a more common language, in order to achieve a greater reach in terms of audience.
English version not available. Please check the Spanish version.
Text only available in Spanish.
Mallorca, 310
08037 Barcelona (España)
Arquímedes, 190 – Colonia Polanco
Delegación Miguel Hidalgo
11560 Ciudad de México (México)
This journal adheres to the principles established by the Committee on Publication Ethics
The editorial process consists of 6 stages:
1. Reception of the manuscript (indeterminate, depending on whether the author meets the requirements): its objective is to verify that the manuscript complies with the specifications of these instructions for authors and that the submitted documentation is complete.
2. Initial editorial review (maximum 5 business days): its objective is to corroborate the relevance, timeliness, originality, and scientific contribution of the manuscript, as well as the methodological and statistical soundness of the study. At this time, it will be submitted to an electronic plagiarism detection system. Derived from this, a rejected opinion may be obtained, or it will be sent for review by peer researchers.
3. Review by peer researchers (maximum 30 business days): the opinion of at least two experts in the area in question will be obtained, who will evaluate the technical and methodological aspects of the investigation.
4. Editorial review (maximum 7 business days): its objective is to make a decision based on the opinion of peer reviewers. The opinion can be rejected, major changes, minor changes or accepted. In the case of major or minor changes, it will be submitted again for evaluation by the initial peer reviewers.
5. Final edition (6 weeks): its objective is the technical and linguistic edition (and translation), layout of galleys, DOI assignment, and correction by the author.
6. Advanced publication: All manuscripts will be published ahead of print on the journal’s website as soon as they complete the editing process, until they are incorporated into a final issue of the journal.