English version not available. Please check the Spanish version.
Víctor I. Romero-Nieto 1, Wilfredo Donoso-Donoso 2, David A. Castañeda-Millán 2
1 Unidad de Urología, Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Grupo de Investigación e Innovación en Urología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2 Unidad de Urología, Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Grupo de Investigación e Innovación en Urología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Bogotá, Colombia
*Correspondence: David A. Castañeda-Millán. Email: dacastanedam@unal.edu.co
Objective: The urology resident is involved in academic and extra-academic situations that can generate exhaustion, disinterest, self-sabotage, and doubts about the value of this own study methods; this context leads to burnout syndrome in an academic context. This syndrome can trigger dropout, low academic performance, low self-esteem, and personal frustration. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of academic burnout syndrome in urology residents in Colombia, and to propose strategies to avoid or reduce academic burnout syndrome in the Colombian context.
Method: Cross-sectional study with convenience sampling in urology residents of all postgraduate academic programs of Colombia. The instrument applied was the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS) measurement scale.
Results: The prevalence of academic burnout in urology residents in Colombia is 59.5% (IC95%: 59.4-59.6%). The areas of possible intervention are categorized into four dimensions: a) time management; b) training strategies; c) extracurricular activities management, and d) mental health care.
Conclusions: Academic burnout syndrome affects 59.5% of urology residents in Colombia. Activities to prevent and treat academic burnout can be focused on: organization of time for academic activities, time reserved for research and extracurricular activities, development of emotional and academical support routes, promotion of university wellness activities.
English version not available. Please check the Spanish version.
Text only available in Spanish.
Mallorca, 310
08037 Barcelona (España)
Arquímedes, 190 – Colonia Polanco
Delegación Miguel Hidalgo
11560 Ciudad de México (México)
This journal adheres to the principles established by the Committee on Publication Ethics
The editorial process consists of 6 stages:
1. Reception of the manuscript (indeterminate, depending on whether the author meets the requirements): its objective is to verify that the manuscript complies with the specifications of these instructions for authors and that the submitted documentation is complete.
2. Initial editorial review (maximum 5 business days): its objective is to corroborate the relevance, timeliness, originality, and scientific contribution of the manuscript, as well as the methodological and statistical soundness of the study. At this time, it will be submitted to an electronic plagiarism detection system. Derived from this, a rejected opinion may be obtained, or it will be sent for review by peer researchers.
3. Review by peer researchers (maximum 30 business days): the opinion of at least two experts in the area in question will be obtained, who will evaluate the technical and methodological aspects of the investigation.
4. Editorial review (maximum 7 business days): its objective is to make a decision based on the opinion of peer reviewers. The opinion can be rejected, major changes, minor changes or accepted. In the case of major or minor changes, it will be submitted again for evaluation by the initial peer reviewers.
5. Final edition (6 weeks): its objective is the technical and linguistic edition (and translation), layout of galleys, DOI assignment, and correction by the author.
6. Advanced publication: All manuscripts will be published ahead of print on the journal’s website as soon as they complete the editing process, until they are incorporated into a final issue of the journal.