English version not available. Please check the Spanish version.
Alejandra Vásquez-Hernández 1 , Jenniffer Puerta-Suárez 2
, Walter D. Cardona-Maya 1
1 Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Grupo Reproducción, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia; 2 Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Grupo Reproducción, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia
*Correspondence: Walter D. Cardona-Maya. Email: wdario.cardona@udea.edu.co
Objective: Circumcision involves the partial or total removal of the skin covering the glans penis to correct medical conditions associated with the development of penile cancer, a procedure described as a protective factor against the development of some diseases. The present article aims to determine the relationship between penile cancer and circumcision as a preventive measure.
Method: An analysis of the percentage of circumcised men and the estimated prevalence of penile cancer in 154 countries was performed. Subsequently, both variables were grouped according to the predominant religion in each country.
Results: A negative correlation was observed between percentages of male circumcision and the estimated prevalence of penile cancer (r: –0.7092; p < 0.0001). Countries with higher percentages of circumcised men and lower prevalence of penile cancer were those where the majority of the population practice Islam or Judaism (p < 0.0001).
Conclusion: In conclusion, considering circumcision as an option to reduce the risk of penile cancer contributes significantly to the improvement in the quality of life of the male population.
English version not available. Please check the Spanish version.
Text only available in Spanish.
Mallorca, 310
08037 Barcelona (España)
Arquímedes, 190 – Colonia Polanco
Delegación Miguel Hidalgo
11560 Ciudad de México (México)
This journal adheres to the principles established by the Committee on Publication Ethics
The editorial process consists of 6 stages:
1. Reception of the manuscript (indeterminate, depending on whether the author meets the requirements): its objective is to verify that the manuscript complies with the specifications of these instructions for authors and that the submitted documentation is complete.
2. Initial editorial review (maximum 5 business days): its objective is to corroborate the relevance, timeliness, originality, and scientific contribution of the manuscript, as well as the methodological and statistical soundness of the study. At this time, it will be submitted to an electronic plagiarism detection system. Derived from this, a rejected opinion may be obtained, or it will be sent for review by peer researchers.
3. Review by peer researchers (maximum 30 business days): the opinion of at least two experts in the area in question will be obtained, who will evaluate the technical and methodological aspects of the investigation.
4. Editorial review (maximum 7 business days): its objective is to make a decision based on the opinion of peer reviewers. The opinion can be rejected, major changes, minor changes or accepted. In the case of major or minor changes, it will be submitted again for evaluation by the initial peer reviewers.
5. Final edition (6 weeks): its objective is the technical and linguistic edition (and translation), layout of galleys, DOI assignment, and correction by the author.
6. Advanced publication: All manuscripts will be published ahead of print on the journal’s website as soon as they complete the editing process, until they are incorporated into a final issue of the journal.