Roby E. Franco-Gómez 1, 2
, Valentina Polanco-Parra 2, 3
, Mauricio A. Suárez-Henao 2, 4
, Jairo A. Jimeno-Orozco 2, 4 
1 Especialización en Psiquiatría, Corporación Universitaria Salud Colombia, Ibagué, Colombia; 2 Semillero de Investigación en Sexualidad Humana (SISH), Facultad de Ciencias para la Salud, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia; 3 Facultad de Ciencias para la Salud, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia; 4 Especialización en Sexología Clínica, Departamento de Salud Mental y Comportamiento Humano, Facultad de Ciencias para la Salud, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia
*Correspondence: Jairo A. Jimeno-Orozco. Email: jairo.jimeno03@gmail.com
Objective: To describe sexual function in Latin American men with a history of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) using the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MSHQ). Method: An observational, cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted in Spanish- speaking men aged 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of GBS and a minimum of 2 years since the acute episode. Data were collected through an online questionnaire that included the MSHQ, sociodemographic variables, and clinical information related to the course of GBS. Statistical analysis was descriptive and exploratory. Continuous variables were summarized using medians and interquartile ranges, while categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. MSHQ domains were operationally grouped into lower and higher score categories using the sample median as the cutoff point. Results: Thirteen responses were received, of which nine met the inclusion criteria. The erectile, ejaculatory, and sexual satisfaction domains showed heterogeneous distributions, with no uniform pattern across participants. In addition, the supplementary MSHQ items revealed variability in sexual activity, sexual desire, and perceived level of bother. Conclusions: In this sample of men with a history of GBS, sexual function exhibited substantial interindividual variability in both functional and subjective components. These exploratory findings highlight the importance of incorporating sexual health into the comprehensive follow-up of individuals with prior GBS and underscore the need for future studies with longitudinal designs and larger sample sizes.
Content available only in Spanish.
Content available only in Spanish.
The editorial process consists of 6 stages:
1. Reception of the manuscript (indeterminate, depending on whether the author meets the requirements): its objective is to verify that the manuscript complies with the specifications of these instructions for authors and that the submitted documentation is complete.
2. Initial editorial review (maximum 5 business days): its objective is to corroborate the relevance, timeliness, originality, and scientific contribution of the manuscript, as well as the methodological and statistical soundness of the study. At this time, it will be submitted to an electronic plagiarism detection system. Derived from this, a rejected opinion may be obtained, or it will be sent for review by peer researchers.
3. Review by peer researchers (maximum 30 business days): the opinion of at least two experts in the area in question will be obtained, who will evaluate the technical and methodological aspects of the investigation.
4. Editorial review (maximum 7 business days): its objective is to make a decision based on the opinion of peer reviewers. The opinion can be rejected, major changes, minor changes or accepted. In the case of major or minor changes, it will be submitted again for evaluation by the initial peer reviewers.
5. Final edition (6 weeks): its objective is the technical and linguistic edition (and translation), layout of galleys, DOI assignment, and correction by the author.
6. Advanced publication: All manuscripts will be published ahead of print on the journal’s website as soon as they complete the editing process, until they are incorporated into a final issue of the journal.